International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines
Leaf rolling is one of the drought avoidance mechanisms to prevent water deficits during drought stress (O'Toole and Change 1978). Loresto et al. (1976), Loresto and Chang (1981) and Chang and Loresto (1986) have suggested leaf rolling as a criterion for scoring drought tolerance in tall and semidwarf rice cultivars. Varietal difference in leaf rolling and unrolling have been observed and it is correlated with internal water status of the leaf tissue. lt is also related with the stomatal closure and decreases transpiration from rice leaves (O'Toole et al. 1979). Degree of leaf rolling during water stress shows diurnal variation and is maximum at 1300 hr.,; (O'Toole 1982). Leaf rolling is induced by the loss of turgor and poor osmotic adjustment (Hsiao et al. 1984). Delayed leaf rolling in an indication of turoor maintenance and a component of dehydration avoidance (Blum 1989).
Genetics of leaf rolling was studied in crosses of five drought resistant and two susceptible parents differing in their leaf rolling behavior during 1989 dry season (February to April) at IRRI in upland condition. The resistant parents were Salumpikit, MGL2, ITA 186, IR33353-64-1-2-1, and IR26702-155-2-3 and the susceptible parents were IR29725-22-3-3-3 and JR29692-65-2-3 (Table 1).Parents, F2 and F3 lines from 10 crosses were grown in Randomized Complete
Table 1. Description of lines used for genetic study.
________________________________________________________________
Designation Parentage Origin Plant Type
________________________________________________________________
Salumpikit Land race Philippines Tall
IR33353-64-1-2-1 IR52/IR36//IR52 IRRI Intermediate
MGL 2 Land race India Tall
ITA 186 Moroberekan/ IITA, Nigeria Tall
Juma 1/TOX7-3-2-3-2//
SE 363G
IR26702-155-2-3 FR13A/IR48//IR42 IRRI Semidwarf
IR29692-65-2-3 IR1794-32-3-1-1-3// IRRI Intermediate
IR9129-209-2-2-2-1
IR29725-22-3-3-3 IR19661-131-1-2/ IRRI Semidwarf
IR9129-209-2-2-2-1
IR20(check)
________________________________________________________________
Block Design in four replications. Twenty F3 lines were randomized in each
replication and a total of 80 F3 lines were undertaken for testing. Ten
gram seeds of each line were dry seeded in 2.5 m long rows spaced 30 cm
apart. Seeding was done in upland granular Maahas clay soil on February 2
and 3, 1989. Salumpikit and IR20 were put together as checks after each
replication to compare the replication differences. Sprinkler irrigation
was used after seeding at every 4 days until 30 days after seedling emergence
and then the irrigation was stopped. Soil moisture status was monitored
using tensiometers and gravimetric method. Rainless period occurred in
April and leaf rolling was observed as first symptom of moisture stress.
IR20 (check) and IR29725-22-3-3-3 first showed the rolling around 0.1 to 0. 2
MPa soil moisture tension (SMT) followed by IR29692-65-2-3 between 0.2 to
0.5 MPa. Among the resistant lines IR26702-155-2-3, ITA186 and MGL2 rolled
between 0.5 to 1.0 MPa, IR33353-64-1-2-1 after 1.0 MPa SMT and Salumpikit did
not show any symptoms even 5 days after 1.0 MPa SMT of drought stress.
Rolling and unrolling did not change between 0900 to 1600 hrs. in dry season
as stress beyond 1.0 MPa increased. Observations were recorded when
susceptible parent showed rolled leaf in different replications and in
different crosses.In analyzing the F2 segregation pattern, out of 10 crosses, 3 showed goodness of fit for 3 rolled and 1 nonrolled (Table 2). All the F3 segregation of over 70
Table 2. Reaction of F2 population and F3 families for leaf
rolling unrolling
________________________________________________________________
F2 Segregation Reaction of F3 Families
Parent/Cross ________________ __________________________
Rolled Unrolled P(3:1) Rolled Segre Unrolled P(1:2:1)
gating
________________________________________________________________
IR33353/IR29692 415 199 <0.01 20 32 23 0.40
IR33353/IR29725 771 280 0.23 19 37 19 0.99
IR26702/IR29692 605 251 <0.01 17 35 18 0.99
IR26702/29725 899 294 0.80 20 35 24 0.49
ITA186/IR29692 621 212 0.79 19 38 16 0.82
ITA186/IR29725 777 215 0.02 18 42 17 0.72
IR29692/Salumpikit 246 147 <0.01 16 31 17 0.95
IR29725/Salumpikit 319 161 <0.01 18 35 16 0.94
IR29692/MGL 2 688 282 <0.01 20 39 19 0.99
IR29725/MGL 2 393 282 <0.01 15 37 24 0.34
________________________________________________________________
lines in each cross showed a ratio of 1 homozygous resistant: 2 segregating
and 1 homozygous susceptible with probability level of 0.34 to 0.99. The
segregating F3 lines in 71 percent cases segregated in 3 rolled and 1
unrolled types (Table 3). Replication differences were observed in different
F2 populations of the crosses, which might be due to micro-plot soil moisture
variation. Some other possible reasons for sgregation distortion in F2 could
be due to sterility on F1 plants, in
Table 3.Frequency distribution of percent unrolled plants in
segregating F3 families of different crosses
________________________________________________________________
Percent Number of Segregating Liens in Different Crosses
Rolled __________________________________________________
Plants IR33353/ IR33353 IR26702/ IR26702/ ITA186/ ITA186/
(Range)IR29692 IR29725 IR29692 IR29725 IR29692 IR29725
________________________________________________________________
10-15 0 0 0 0 6 1
16-20 4 1 2 4 5 1
21-25 6 5 10 11 11 15
26-30 5 4 12 12 8 10
31-35 1 14 8 2 5 10
36-40 1 5 1 3 2 2
41-45 0 2 2 1 0 3
46-50 2 2 0 0 1 0
51-55 2 2 0 1 0 0
56-60 2 1 0 1 0 0
61-65 3 0 0 0 0 0
66-70 1 1 0 0 0 0
71-75 4 0 0 0 0 0
76-80 1 0 0 0 0 0
81-85 0 0 0 0 0 0
________________________________________________________________
Total segre-
gating lines 32 37 35 35 38 42
________________________________________________________________
Percent Number of Segregating Liens in Different Crosses
Rolled __________________________________________________
Plan Total
(Range) IR29692 IR29692/ IR29692 IR29725 Lines
Salumpikit Salumpikit NGL2 MGL2
________________________________________________________________
10-15 0 3 2 0 13
16-20 0 6 2 0 25
21-25 10 4 13 2 87
26-30 11 5 13 4 84
31-35 5 6 5 7 63
36-40 3 3 4 6 30
41-45 1 4 0 3 16
46-50 0 2 0 2 9
51-55 1 1 0 0 7
56-60 0 1 0 2 7
61-65 0 0 0 3 6
66-70 0 0 0 4 6
71-75 0 0 0 1 5
76-80 0 0 0 2 3
81-85 0 0 0 1 1
________________________________________________________________
Total segre-
gating lines 31 35 39 37 362
________________________________________________________________
crosses with MGL2, ITA186 and Salunipikit with susceptible parents; smaller
F2 population in crosses with Salumpikit due to poor germination and
occurrance of 3 to 10 percent resistant plants in two susceptible parents.A new gene symbol of Ir is being proposed for leaf unrolling under water deficits.
References
Blum, A., 1988. Drought resistance. In Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. p. 43-77.
Chang, T. T. and G. C. Loresto, 1986. Screening techniques for drought resistance in rice. p. 108-129. In Approaches for incorporating drought and salinity resistance in crop plants. Ed. V. L. Chopra and R. S. Paroda. Oxford IBH, New Delhi.
Hsiao, T. C., J. C. O'Toole, E. B. Yambao and N. C. Turner, 1984. Influence of osmotic adjustment on leaf rolling and tissue death in rice. Plant Physiol. 75: 328.
Loresto, G. C., T. T. Chang and 0. Tagumpay, 1976. Field evaluation and breeding for drought resistance. Phil. Jour. Sci. 1: 36-39.
_____ and T. T. Chang, 1981. Decimal scoring systems for drought reaction and recovery ability in rice screening nurseries. Inter. Rice Res. Newsletter 6(2): 9-10.
O'Toole, J. C., 1982. Adaptation of rice to drought prone environments. p. 195-213. In Drought resistance in crops with emphasis on rice. International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.
____ and T. T. Chang, 1978. Drought and rice improvement in perspective. IRRI Research Paper Series, No. 14. International Rice Research Institute.
____ and R. T. Cruz, 1979. Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf rolling to water stress. Plant Physiol. 64: 628.
____, _____ and T. N. Singh, 1979. Leaf rolling and transpiration. Plant Sci. Lett. 16: 111-114.