Hokuriku National Agricultural Experiment Station
Joetsu 943-01, Japan
This review summarizes the current status of rice chromosome research with special reference to technological aspects. Whole view of the recent advances in rice chromosome research has recently been reported (Fukui in press). Main new technologies which appeared in these years are such as, imaging methods, molecular cytology, chromosome painting and laser dissection methods.
I. Imaging methods in rice chromosome research
The most important advance in imaging fields is that the new image parameter, CP was defined and applied to identification of plant chromosomes and development of a

mitotic rice chromosome map (Pukui and Mukai 1988; Fukui
and Iijima 1991). The CP is a profile of density distribution along a mid-rib
of chromatid of rice chromosomes, which represents the condensation pattern
of rice chromosome at the mitotic pro-metaphase stage. Fig. 1 shows the
condensation pattern of rice chromosome 11 and definition of a quantitative
chromosome map by thresholding the CP at the two gray levels. Fig. 2 shows
the quantitative chromosome map for rice mitotic chromosomes rearranged
in the order of the new rice chromosome number (Fukui and lijima 1991).
All the rice chromosomes were also characterized by their morphology and
the detailed
| Table 1 | ||
| A. General information | B. Characteristics of the condensed regions | C. Characteristics of the dispersed regions |
| Chromosome 1 Metacentries, relative length | The degree of condensation of | Two FUSCs can be observed in |
| (Big One or 13.6 ± 1.1, ami ratio 1.58 ± | the pCR is nearly equal or | the pDR (e.g., chromosomes la |
| Daichan) 0.23. The chromosome shows | greater than that of the qCR (P | and le), which frequently ap- |
| a low condensation typically | =90.0%). The pCR is rarely | pear to be fused to a single |
| with large dispersed regions. | divided into two subregions (P | FUSC (P=90.0%, e.g., chromo- |
| Length of the pCR and the qCR | =6.7%), while the qCR is some- | some 1d). One to five FUSC(s) |
| is approximately the same. | times separated into two sub- | can frequently be observed in |
| Length of the qDR is about | regions (P=26.7%). | the qDR (f=100%, e.g., chro- |
| twice that of the pDR. | mosomes la and 1f). | |
| Cromosome 2 Metacentries, ralative length | The degree of condensation of | There is one FUSC in the pDR |
| (Big meta or 11.7 ± 1.2, arm ratio 1.10 ± | the pCR is the same or slightly | or the pter (P=93.3%, e.g., |
| Ohmeta) 0.25. The DRs occupy most of | greater than that of the qCR (P | chromosomes 2c and 2e). There |
| the chromosomal regions and | =63.3%). The pCR is never | are several FUSCs in the qDR or |
| the degree of condensation is | divided into two segments, | the qter and they are freuqnetly |
| low (the average gray value of | whereas the qCR is sometimes | fused into one FUSC (P=100%. |
| the CP is large). The visual | divided into two regions (P | e.g., chromosomes 2d and 2e). |
| pattern of the chromosome is | =20.0%). | There is a gap in both the pDR |
| more or less symmetrical. The | (P=80.0%. e.g., chormosomes | |
| chromatids at the end of both | 2c and 2e) and the qDR (P= | |
| arms are detached and two chro- | 50.0%, e.g., chromosome 2e), | |
| matids can be observed indi- | and that of the pDR appears | |
| vidually (e.g., chromosomes 2d | more clearly. | |
| and 2e). | ||
| Chromosome 3 Submetacentrics,relative length | The degree of condensation at | One telomeric FUSC: often ap- |
| (Big slug or 10.9 ± 0.9, arm ratio 1.72 ± | the pCR is the same or greater | pears more distinctly at the pter |
| Ohname) 0.21. Both the pDR and qDR | than that of the qCR (P | than those of chromosomes 1 |
| occupy a large part of the chro- | =63.3%) | and 2 (P=83.3%, e.g., chro- |
| mosome and the length of qDR | mosomes 3b and 3c). There | |
| is twice as much as that of the | are frequently one to four | |
| pDR. | FUSC(s) in the qDR (P | |
| =90.0%, e.g., chromosomes 3e | ||
| and 3f). | ||
| Chromosome 4 Submetacentrics, relative length | The degree of condensation in | There are no FUSC at the short |
| (Comet or Tern) 9.1 ± 0.6, arm ratio 2.93 ± 0.29. | the pCR is slightly greater or | arm and the whole short arm is |
| Most of the short arm is con- | the same as that in the qCR (P | condensed uniformly (P= 100%, |
| densed. Two chromatids are | =66.7%). | e.g., chromosomes 4d and 4f). |
| not detached at the pter (e.g., | There are one to three FUSC(s) | |
| chromosomes 4b and 4e). The | in the qDR (f=96.7%, e.g., | |
| pCR and qCR show nearly the | chromosomes 4c and 4d). | |
| same length and degree of con- | ||
| densation, and the qDR is quite | ||
| long and dispersed. | ||
| Chromosome 5 Metacentries, relative length 8.3 | The degree of condensation of | There is sometimes one FUSC at |
| (Carnival) ± 0.6, arm ratio 1.12 ± 0.09. The | both the pCR and qCR varies | the pter, (P=83.3%, e.g., chro- |
| visual pattern of the chromo- | from chromosome to chromo- | mosome5d), and at the qter (P |
| some is more or less symmetri- | some, although the average con- | =50.0%, e.g., chromosome 5a). |
| cal at the centromere as a sym- | densation degree is more or less | |
| metrical axis. It typically dis- | equal. | |
| plays a complete set of four | ||
| concaves of two small and two | ||
| large ones on its CP, although | ||
| the frequencies of typical pattern | ||
| is low. The assignment of the | ||
| short and long arm is completely | ||
| based on the length of each arm. | ||
3D Rice Genetics Newsletter Vol. 13
| same (P=83.3%). When a | B. Characteristics of the condensed regions | C. Characteristics of the dispersed regions | |
| Chromosome 6 | Metacentrics. relative length 7.9 | The condensation degree of the | There is a FUSC in the central |
| (Phantom or | ± 0.6, arm ratio 1.68 ± 0.21. | pCR is greater than that of the | part of the pDR (P=40.0%, e.g., |
| Terumodoki) | This chromosome shows vari- | qCR (P=83.3%). | chromosomes 6b and 6f). There |
| able patterns. The typical type | are several FUSCs in the qDR ( | ||
| exhibits a very small qCR com- | P=96.7%, e.g., chromosomes 6a | ||
| pared with the pCR (e.g., chro- | and 6c). | ||
| mosomes 6a and 6c) and the | |||
| distinct dispersed regions on | |||
| both arms, whereas the pDR is | |||
| smaller than the qDR (e.g., chro- | |||
| mosomes 6a and 6b). A great- | |||
| er part of the short arm is some- | |||
| times condensed with simulta- | |||
| neous occurrence of bifurcation | |||
| at the end of the chromatids to | |||
| the outside, with tapering off to | |||
| a point (e.g., chromosome | |||
| 6d). The end of the chromatids | |||
| of the long arm converged (e.g., | |||
| chromosomes 6a and 6f). | |||
| Chromosome 7 | Metacentrics, relative length 7.6 | The condensation degree of the | The long arm often has a FUSC |
| (Disturber) | ± 0.5, arm ratio 1.61 ± 0.31. The | pCR is the same or slightly | at the qDR (P=66.7%, e.g., |
| chromosome shows variable | greater than that of the qCR (P | chromsome 7d). | |
| patterns. In the typical pattern, | =86.6%). The short arm has a | ||
| the lengths of the pCR and the | telomeric FUSC (P=76.7%, | ||
| qCR are identical or the qCR is | e.g., chromosomes 7a and | ||
| slightly longer. The qDR is | 7f). The whole region of the | ||
| distinct, whereas the pDR is | short arm is often condensed (P | ||
| very small. A typical short | =70.0%, e.g., chromosomes 7d | ||
| arm appears as the junction of | and 7e). | ||
| the pCR and the telomeric con- | |||
| densed region (e.g., chromoso- | |||
| mes 7b and 7f). | |||
| Chromosome 8 | Metacentrics, relative length 6.6 | The degree of condensation of | The ends of the chromatids at |
| (Rocket) | ± 0.4, arm ratio 1.24 ± 0.13. The | the pCR is the same or slightly | the pter are not separated (P= |
| whole part of the short arm is | lower than that of the qCR (P | 53.3%, e.g., chromosomes 8c | |
| condensed. The visual pCR is | =76.7%). The pCR frequently | and 8d), although they are sepa- | |
| frequently longer than the qCR | appears longer than the qCR | rated at the qter (P=80.0%, e.g., | |
| and the long arm has a relatively | from visual inspection of the | chromosomes 8d and 8f). | |
| long qDR. As an alternative | photographs (e.g., chromo- | ||
| pattern, the pCR is divided into | somes 8b and 8c), although the | ||
| two segments and the pter is | average length determined by | ||
| relatively darker than usual. | the CP analysis is almost the | ||
| Consequently three darkly stain- | same (P=83.3%). When a | ||
| ed blocks appear, two at the | gap-like structure appears in the | ||
| short arm and one at the long | pCR, the CP line of the pCR | ||
| arm. The qter of the chromo- | becomes variable (P= 16.7%, | ||
| some is sometimes bifurcate | e.g., chromosomes 8a). | ||
| (e.g., chromosomes 8d and 80. | |||
| Cromosome 9 | Metacentrics, relative length 6.6 | One and two condensed regions | There are no FUSCs at the short |
| (Trimodal or | ± 0.5, arm ratio 1.26 ± 0.11. The | frequently appear at the respec- | arm (P=86.7%, e.g., chromo- |
| Mitsuyama) | greater part of the chromosome | tive short and long arms | somes 9b and 9c). The chro- |
| is condensed. Three condens- | (P=96.7%, e.g., chromosome | matids are not separated at the | |
| ed blocks appear or, alternative- | 9a). | telomeric ends of the long arm | |
| ly a slit can be observed in the | (P=80%,, e.g., chromosomes | ||
| center of the qCR (e.g., chromo- | 9d and 9f). | ||
| somes 9a and 9c). |
| A. General information | B. Characteristics of the condensed regions | C. Characteristics of the dispersed regions |
| Chromosome 10 Metacentrics, relative length 6.1 | The degree of condensation of | There are no FUSCs in the pDR |
| (Plump or ± 0.4, arm ratio 1.26 ± 0.12. The | the pCR is usually smaller than | (f=83.3%) or in the qDR (P |
| Shimobukure) greater part of the chromosome | that of the qCR (P= 100%). The | =83.3%, e.g., chromosomes l0e |
| is condensed. | pCR is frequently shorter than | and 10f). |
| the qCR in photographic | ||
| images (P=96.7%, e.g., chro- | ||
| mosomes l0b and 10c). | ||
| Chromosome 11 Subtelocentrics, relative length | The degree of condensation at | There is no FUSC at the pDR (P |
| (Satellite or Sat) 5.8 ± 0.6, arm ratio 3.90 ± | the pCR is very low and the | =100%, e.g., chromsome lla). |
| 1.11. A satellite chromosome. | region is much smaller than | One or two FUSCs appears fre- |
| The short arm is much smaller | that of the qCR (P= 100%, e.g., | quently in the qDR (P=80.0%. |
| than the long arm. Sometimes | chromosomes 11e and 11d). | e.g., chromosome 11d). |
| the end of the chromatids of the | ||
| long arm opens like a fan (e.g., | ||
| chromosomes 1la and llf). A | ||
| satellite can sometimes be found | ||
| separately or attached to the | ||
| short arm. The chromosome is | ||
| also located at an attaching or a | ||
| close position to a nucleolus. | ||
| Almost all the regions of the | ||
| short arm and most of the long | ||
| arm are both heavily condensed | ||
| (e.g., chromosome llf). It is | ||
| sometimes difficult to identity | ||
| the centromeric position (e.g., | ||
| chromosome llb). | ||
| Chromosome 12 Submetacentrics, relative length | The degree of condensation of | There is frequently a FUSC in |
| (Little comet or 5.8 ± 0.4, arm ratio 2.00 ± | the pCR is the same or greater | the center of the qDR (P= |
| Koteru) 0.37. The general morphology | than that of the qCR (P= | 60.0%, e.g., chromosomes 12a |
| is very similar to that of chro- | 80.0%). | and 12d). No FUSC appears |
| mosome 4, but about two thirds | in the pDR (P=100%, e.g., | |
| in size. The relative percent- | e.g., chromosome 11d). | |
| age of the qDR is slightly lower | ||
| than that of chromosome 4. |
descriptions were given to all the rice chromosomes with statistical data as shown in Table 1 (Fukui and Iijima 1992).
An automatic identification method of rice chromosomes based on CP has also been established (Kamisugi et al. 1992). The three statistical methods such as, a discrimination chart method, a linear discrimination method, and a minimum distance classifier method to identify the chromosome number automatically were tested. As a result, 92.2% of the rice chromosomes are correctly identified by the minimum distance classifier method. The discrimination chart and linear discrimination methods gave respective 91.1 and 84.4% of correct identification. These results are good proof that the CP contains sufficient information to determine the chromosome number and is the stable parameter representing morphological information of rice chromosomes.

Development of a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method improved the detection efficiency and sensitivity. Fukui et al. (1994) detected one rDNA locus in 0. sativa (japonica), 0. rufipogon, and 0. brachyantha. Two 45S rDNA loci were found in 0. sativa (indica and javanica), 0. rufipogon, and 0. australiensis. Three loci were revealed in 0. officinalis (Fig. 3). It seems that there is no species dependent tendency but geographical trend in the number of 45S rDNA loci. It is worth noticing that the variation of one and two 45S rDNA loci detected in japonica and indica also exists in their ancestral species of 0. rufipogon.
5S rDNA has also physically been mapped by ISH on chromosome 9 of indica rice (Song and Gustafson 1993) and on chromosome II of japonica rice (Kamisugi et al. 1994). The 5S rDNA locus is localized at the position 4% away from centromere toward the distal end on the short arm in japonica rice. Further research on localization of 5S rDNA using several rice species by FISH revealed that rice has only one locus and they are located on chromosome 11 without exceptions (Shishido et al. 1994).
Ohmido and Fukui (1995) developed a multicolor FISH (McFISH) method using 45S and 5S rDNA probes simultaneously in the African cultivated rice, 0. glaberrima and detected identical localization of both the rDNAs on the chromosomes as in 0. sativa ssp. japonica.
Several repeated sequences of rice such as TrsA, TrsB, TrsC, and RIREI (Ohtsubo et al. 1991; Noma et al. 1996) have been successfully mapped on the rice chromosomes
Jiang et al. (1995) reported mapping BAG clones on the chromosomes by FISH. The successful mapping in YAC, BAC, cosmid clones and even RFLP markers on rice chromosomes have also been obtained (Ohmido and Fukui in preparation). Therefore it is anticipated that the reproducible mapping of single copy genes with less than 1 kb nucleotide sequences will be a common technique in rice chromosomes.
III. Chromosome painting
Chromosome painting is a variation of ISH using total genomic DNAs as the probe. The method is also called as genomic in situ hybridization, GISH. GISH has been used for phylogenetic studies and identification of alien chromosome(s) from different genome(s) in the genus Oryza. As the probe is the mixture of unique and repetitive sequences, the signals uniformly cover all over the chromosome(s).
Chromosome painting using tetraploid rice species with different genomes by GISH was tried (Fukui et al. in preparation). They extracted genomic DNA from 0. officinalis, a diploid C genome species and use the genomic DNA as the probe to paint the chromosomes originated from C genome diploid species in the two amphidiploid species of 0. minuta, BBCC and 0. latifolia, CCDD.
Twenty four chromosomes derived from an ancestral diploid C genome species were clearly painted both in 0. minuta and 0. latifolia. The chromosomes originated from a D genome species have been identified for the first time under the microscope. The fact that the differences in the intensity of the fluorescent signals between the B and C genome chromosomes were clearer than that between the C and D genome indicates that C and D genomes are closely related to each other than the B and C genomes.
IV. Laser dissection of rice chromosomes
Recent advances in laser optics makes it possible to dissect plant chromosomes (laser knife, Fukui et al. 1995). Laser microdissection seems to be a useful technology in chromosome research. Fig. 4 shows that the representative steps of laser dissection of rice chromosomes (Fukui et al. 1992). Fig. 4a shows the rice chromosomal spread prepared by the enzymatic maceration/air drying (EMA) method (Fukui and Iijima 1992; Fukui 1996). Two chromosomal regions of chromosome 4 were dissected in this case. Scattered cytoplasmic debris was eliminated at first and unnecessary chromosomes at the peripheral region were laser ablated (Fig. 4b). Then all the rice chromosomes within the spread except for chromosome 4 were removed by laser ablation (Fig. 4c). A fine laser beam was then applied to eliminate the condensed region to obtain the dispersed tail region of the chromosome 4. For the other chromosome 4, the
At the end of this review, it is stressed that the most significant aspect now in the rice chromosome field is that a bridge over the gap between molecular and chromosomal studies has been spanned by success in FISH using RFLP markers and so called extended DNA fiber FISH (Ohmido et al. in preparation). Moreover the chromosome research will be expanded into the science concerning 3D structural and dynamic analyses of genetic information.
Fukui, K., M. Minezawa, Y. Kamisugi, N. Ohmido, M. Ishikawa, T. Yanagisawa, M. Fujishita and F. Sakai, 1991. Microdissection of plant chromosomes by argon ion laser beam. Theor Appl Genet 84: 787-791.
Jiang, J,, B,S, Gill, G.L. Wang, P.C. Ronald and D.C. Ward, 1995. Metaphase and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization mapping of the rice genome with bacterial artificial chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4487-4491.
Ohmido, N., E. Ohtsubo, H. Ohtusbo, G.S. Khush and K. Fukui, 1993. Analysis and utility of chromosome information 52. Physical mapping of rice DNAs with different copy numbers by improved fluorescence in situ hybridization. Abst. XVth Intl Bot. Cong. 501.
60. Detection of 5S rDNA locus in Oryza spp. by multicolor FISH. Japan. J. Breed. 44(Suppl. 1 ): 47 Song, Y.C. and J.P. Gustafson, 1993. Physical mapping of the 5S rDNA gene complex in rice (Oryza sativa).